Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 07:16

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Flipping two atoms in LSD turned it into a powerful treatment for damaged brain circuits - PsyPost
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Snowflake to acquire database startup Crunchy Data - TechCrunch
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What is one thing you've learned from life?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Apple Has a Huge Siri Problem That WWDC 2025 Probably Won’t Fix - Gizmodo
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
More King County measles exposures, including at Costco in Issaquah - The Seattle Times
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Musk Denies Ketamine Use Following New York Times Report - Bloomberg.com
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?